Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpfE2O7K/MYNAT_nosorts

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(x(N, 0)) → mark(0)
active(x(N, s(M))) → mark(plus(x(N, M), N))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(x(X1, X2)) → x(active(X1), X2)
active(x(X1, X2)) → x(X1, active(X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
x(mark(X1), X2) → mark(x(X1, X2))
x(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(x(X1, X2))
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(x(X1, X2)) → x(proper(X1), proper(X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
x(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(x(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(x(N, 0)) → mark(0)
active(x(N, s(M))) → mark(plus(x(N, M), N))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(x(X1, X2)) → x(active(X1), X2)
active(x(X1, X2)) → x(X1, active(X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
x(mark(X1), X2) → mark(x(X1, X2))
x(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(x(X1, X2))
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(x(X1, X2)) → x(proper(X1), proper(X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
x(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(x(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(ok(X)) → S(X)
ACTIVE(plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(X1, active(X2))
TOP(mark(X)) → PROPER(X)
PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(and(X1, X2)) → AND(active(X1), X2)
AND(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
TOP(ok(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
X(mark(X1), X2) → X(X1, X2)
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → AND(proper(X1), proper(X2))
PROPER(plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(proper(X1), proper(X2))
ACTIVE(x(X1, X2)) → X(X1, active(X2))
PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → PLUS(N, M)
PLUS(X1, mark(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
X(X1, mark(X2)) → X(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(x(N, s(M))) → X(N, M)
TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))
ACTIVE(plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(active(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → S(plus(N, M))
ACTIVE(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
ACTIVE(x(X1, X2)) → X(active(X1), X2)
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(x(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(x(X1, X2)) → X(proper(X1), proper(X2))
ACTIVE(x(N, s(M))) → PLUS(x(N, M), N)
PROPER(s(X)) → S(proper(X))
PROPER(plus(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
ACTIVE(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
X(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → X(X1, X2)
PLUS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(x(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))
PROPER(plus(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(x(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
ACTIVE(x(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → S(active(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(x(N, 0)) → mark(0)
active(x(N, s(M))) → mark(plus(x(N, M), N))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(x(X1, X2)) → x(active(X1), X2)
active(x(X1, X2)) → x(X1, active(X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
x(mark(X1), X2) → mark(x(X1, X2))
x(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(x(X1, X2))
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(x(X1, X2)) → x(proper(X1), proper(X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
x(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(x(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(ok(X)) → S(X)
ACTIVE(plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(X1, active(X2))
TOP(mark(X)) → PROPER(X)
PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(and(X1, X2)) → AND(active(X1), X2)
AND(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
TOP(ok(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
X(mark(X1), X2) → X(X1, X2)
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → AND(proper(X1), proper(X2))
PROPER(plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(proper(X1), proper(X2))
ACTIVE(x(X1, X2)) → X(X1, active(X2))
PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → PLUS(N, M)
PLUS(X1, mark(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
X(X1, mark(X2)) → X(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(x(N, s(M))) → X(N, M)
TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))
ACTIVE(plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(active(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → S(plus(N, M))
ACTIVE(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
ACTIVE(x(X1, X2)) → X(active(X1), X2)
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(x(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(x(X1, X2)) → X(proper(X1), proper(X2))
ACTIVE(x(N, s(M))) → PLUS(x(N, M), N)
PROPER(s(X)) → S(proper(X))
PROPER(plus(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
ACTIVE(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
X(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → X(X1, X2)
PLUS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(x(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))
PROPER(plus(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(x(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
ACTIVE(x(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → S(active(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(x(N, 0)) → mark(0)
active(x(N, s(M))) → mark(plus(x(N, M), N))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(x(X1, X2)) → x(active(X1), X2)
active(x(X1, X2)) → x(X1, active(X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
x(mark(X1), X2) → mark(x(X1, X2))
x(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(x(X1, X2))
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(x(X1, X2)) → x(proper(X1), proper(X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
x(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(x(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 7 SCCs with 16 less nodes.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

X(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → X(X1, X2)
X(X1, mark(X2)) → X(X1, X2)
X(mark(X1), X2) → X(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(x(N, 0)) → mark(0)
active(x(N, s(M))) → mark(plus(x(N, M), N))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(x(X1, X2)) → x(active(X1), X2)
active(x(X1, X2)) → x(X1, active(X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
x(mark(X1), X2) → mark(x(X1, X2))
x(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(x(X1, X2))
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(x(X1, X2)) → x(proper(X1), proper(X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
x(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(x(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [15] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its argument. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [17] from R.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

X(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → X(X1, X2)
X(X1, mark(X2)) → X(X1, X2)
X(mark(X1), X2) → X(X1, X2)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

X(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → X(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2
X(X1, mark(X2)) → X(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2
X(mark(X1), X2) → X(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(ok(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(x(N, 0)) → mark(0)
active(x(N, s(M))) → mark(plus(x(N, M), N))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(x(X1, X2)) → x(active(X1), X2)
active(x(X1, X2)) → x(X1, active(X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
x(mark(X1), X2) → mark(x(X1, X2))
x(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(x(X1, X2))
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(x(X1, X2)) → x(proper(X1), proper(X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
x(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(x(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(ok(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

S(ok(X)) → S(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, mark(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(x(N, 0)) → mark(0)
active(x(N, s(M))) → mark(plus(x(N, M), N))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(x(X1, X2)) → x(active(X1), X2)
active(x(X1, X2)) → x(X1, active(X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
x(mark(X1), X2) → mark(x(X1, X2))
x(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(x(X1, X2))
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(x(X1, X2)) → x(proper(X1), proper(X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
x(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(x(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, mark(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

PLUS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2
PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
PLUS(X1, mark(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(x(N, 0)) → mark(0)
active(x(N, s(M))) → mark(plus(x(N, M), N))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(x(X1, X2)) → x(active(X1), X2)
active(x(X1, X2)) → x(X1, active(X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
x(mark(X1), X2) → mark(x(X1, X2))
x(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(x(X1, X2))
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(x(X1, X2)) → x(proper(X1), proper(X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
x(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(x(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
AND(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(x(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(plus(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(plus(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(x(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(x(N, 0)) → mark(0)
active(x(N, s(M))) → mark(plus(x(N, M), N))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(x(X1, X2)) → x(active(X1), X2)
active(x(X1, X2)) → x(X1, active(X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
x(mark(X1), X2) → mark(x(X1, X2))
x(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(x(X1, X2))
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(x(X1, X2)) → x(proper(X1), proper(X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
x(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(x(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(x(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(plus(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(plus(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(x(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
PROPER(x(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
PROPER(plus(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
PROPER(plus(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
PROPER(x(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(x(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(x(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(x(N, 0)) → mark(0)
active(x(N, s(M))) → mark(plus(x(N, M), N))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(x(X1, X2)) → x(active(X1), X2)
active(x(X1, X2)) → x(X1, active(X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
x(mark(X1), X2) → mark(x(X1, X2))
x(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(x(X1, X2))
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(x(X1, X2)) → x(proper(X1), proper(X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
x(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(x(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(x(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(x(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

ACTIVE(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
ACTIVE(x(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
ACTIVE(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
ACTIVE(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
ACTIVE(x(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))
TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(x(N, 0)) → mark(0)
active(x(N, s(M))) → mark(plus(x(N, M), N))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(x(X1, X2)) → x(active(X1), X2)
active(x(X1, X2)) → x(X1, active(X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
x(mark(X1), X2) → mark(x(X1, X2))
x(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(x(X1, X2))
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(x(X1, X2)) → x(proper(X1), proper(X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
x(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(x(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the usable rules with reduction pair processor [15] with a polynomial ordering [25], all dependency pairs and the corresponding usable rules [17] can be oriented non-strictly. All non-usable rules are removed, and those dependency pairs and usable rules that have been oriented strictly or contain non-usable symbols in their left-hand side are removed as well.

No dependency pairs are removed.

No rules are removed from R.

Used ordering: POLO with Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(TOP(x₁)) = x₁
POL(active(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(ok(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(plus(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + 2·x₂
POL(proper(x₁)) = x₁
POL(s(x₁)) = x₁
POL(tt) = 0
POL(x(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₁ + 2·x₂

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))
TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(x(X1, X2)) → x(proper(X1), proper(X2))
x(mark(X1), X2) → mark(x(X1, X2))
x(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(x(X1, X2))
x(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(x(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(x(N, 0)) → mark(0)
active(x(N, s(M))) → mark(plus(x(N, M), N))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(x(X1, X2)) → x(active(X1), X2)
active(x(X1, X2)) → x(X1, active(X2))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))

Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
TOP(x1) = TOP(x1)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
proper(x1) = x1
ok(x1) = x1
active(x1) = x1
0 = 0
s(x1) = s(x1)
x(x1, x2) = x(x1, x2)
and(x1, x2) = and(x1, x2)
tt = tt
plus(x1, x2) = plus(x1, x2)

Recursive path order with status [2].
Quasi-Precedence:

TOP₁ > [mark₁, s₁, tt]
x₂ > 0 > [mark₁, s₁, tt]
x₂ > plus₂ > [mark₁, s₁, tt]
and₂ > [mark₁, s₁, tt]

Status:

plus₂: multiset
tt: multiset
mark₁: [1]
x₂: [1,2]
s₁: [1]
TOP₁: [1]
and₂: multiset
0: multiset

The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(x(X1, X2)) → x(proper(X1), proper(X2))
x(mark(X1), X2) → mark(x(X1, X2))
x(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(x(X1, X2))
x(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(x(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(x(N, s(M))) → mark(plus(x(N, M), N))
active(x(N, 0)) → mark(0)
active(x(X1, X2)) → x(X1, active(X2))
active(x(X1, X2)) → x(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(tt) → ok(tt)
proper(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(x(X1, X2)) → x(proper(X1), proper(X2))
x(mark(X1), X2) → mark(x(X1, X2))
x(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(x(X1, X2))
x(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(x(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(x(N, 0)) → mark(0)
active(x(N, s(M))) → mark(plus(x(N, M), N))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(x(X1, X2)) → x(active(X1), X2)
active(x(X1, X2)) → x(X1, active(X2))

active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)

Used ordering: POLO with Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(TOP(x₁)) = x₁
POL(active(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₁ + 2·x₂
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(ok(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(plus(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(s(x₁)) = x₁
POL(tt) = 2
POL(x(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₁ + x₂

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RuleRemovalProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(x(N, 0)) → mark(0)
active(x(N, s(M))) → mark(plus(x(N, M), N))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(x(X1, X2)) → x(active(X1), X2)
active(x(X1, X2)) → x(X1, active(X2))
x(mark(X1), X2) → mark(x(X1, X2))
x(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(x(X1, X2))
x(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(x(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the rule removal processor [15] with the following polynomial ordering [25], at least one Dependency Pair or term rewrite system rule of this QDP problem can be strictly oriented.
Strictly oriented dependency pairs:

TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))

Strictly oriented rules of the TRS R:

active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(x(N, 0)) → mark(0)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(active(X1), X2)
active(plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, active(X2))
active(x(X1, X2)) → x(active(X1), X2)
active(x(X1, X2)) → x(X1, active(X2))
x(mark(X1), X2) → mark(x(X1, X2))
x(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(x(X1, X2))
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(plus(X1, X2))
plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(plus(X1, X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))

Used ordering: POLO with Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 1
POL(TOP(x₁)) = x₁
POL(active(x₁)) = 1 + 2·x₁
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + 2·x₁ + 2·x₂
POL(mark(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(ok(x₁)) = 2 + 2·x₁
POL(plus(x₁, x₂)) = 2 + x₁ + 2·x₂
POL(s(x₁)) = x₁
POL(x(x₁, x₂)) = 2 + 2·x₁ + x₂

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ PisEmptyProof

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(x(N, s(M))) → mark(plus(x(N, M), N))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
x(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(x(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
plus(mark(X1), X2) → mark(plus(X1, X2))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.